Dear Sadhguru, please stop saving us…




As beards appear to be computation-amplifiers in India, our great saviour Sadhguru has just calculated that we are going to have 30% less water than we need in 2030.

So, as a self-appointed guardian of our planet, he has magnanimously decided to face inconvenience of driving in a 2.3 crore Mercedes G63 AGM with a small 5.5 lt engine (compared to planet-polluting 1.0 lt cars that most of us lesser mortals drive) across India to save our rivers.

While I never grudge anyone having fun at the cost of emotional suckers (as, given an opportunity, I would also love to do the same), but, I do have a small problem here, as I inhabit the same planet he plans to save.

On my planet, I don’t see herds of elephants or pterodactyl or rain forest canopy outside my window. I have (admittedly unfounded) suspicion that they are not there because it is not ecologically viable for them to be there. On my Earth, life is like a marketplace where only those who profit in commerce of energy transaction called living remain alive.

Sadhguru’s planet runs on completely different logic. When he looks at a river and can’t see one kilometre belt of trees on riversides, he knows for sure that it is a dirty trick played by us humans that has caused vanishing of these trees that would have otherwise saved the river.

So, as an ecologist, climatology and geologist rolled in one, Sadhguru has a “simplest” solution proposed on his webpage to save our rivers, i.e. “maintain a minimum of one kilometre tree cover on riversides. This will ensure our rivers are fed throughout the year by the moist soil.”

On my planet, rivers are just waterways that drain rainwater of a large catchment area, into sea, and riversides are mostly flood-plains having ecological cycle with plant species able to survive seasonal water logging. So, I don’t have an iota of idea how a kilometre belt of trees on the riversides is going to survive and perform the magic proposed by Sadhguru, but I am now seriously worried because I see a lot of starry-eyed kids getting mesmerised by the new age guru.

As far as I can see, the way life on this planet works, if riversides were really suited for trees, all our technology wouldn’t have been able to prevent them from being there (If you can’t believe it, try your hands at eradicating a simplest creature like house rat).

When you insert any life form where is naturally not there, even if it is a beautiful banyan tree or a cute rabbit, you are just messing up with energy market that is operated by nature. So, you need to force it there with brute power of artificial support. Such acts disrupt and destabilise ecological balance. So this forced-forestation is a scary idea, especially when proposed by someone as powerful as Sadhguru.

Frankly, I know that Sadhguru is an intelligent man who knows that like all “simplest” solutions, his idea is completely impossible to execute on ground, so all he is doing is pressing the tree-button, that urban youth living in concrete jungle falls for every time, to gain popularity. But, I now feel that he is having a bit too much fun at our cost.

As humanity is on a guilt trip of having “destroyed” nature, it has become highly vulnerable to these saviours proposing random ideas of saving nature. I am not too worried about nature, as it is surely not fragile; but, we as a race are.

It is unlikely that we can suffer so much saving without serious problems. Humanity needs to be saved, from the self-appointed saviours of this planet.

I am happy to admit that I have managed surviving till now with minimum effort as all my intellect has be used to avoid doing anything meaningful. As I needed to while all the free time I generated in course of being lazy, science has been my favorite muse that I have enjoyed company of. As an effort to kill time (in a way, to get even with it) one fine day I decided to write a science column, more for my personal amusement than to attract readers. After getting educated about the attention span of modern readers from my editor, it became more like a challenge to tackle esoteric subjects in 600 words that I have managed to remain interested in for more than a year now. I do not want to add my worldly profile here as these are ideas that need to be considered only on the merits they carry and not as an opinion of a certain human being.

2 comments on “Dear Sadhguru, please stop saving us…

  1. Anonymous

    The simple fact world over is when forests are removed, rivers have dried. Understanding rivers as ‘water ways for rain waters to get into sea’ is incomplete and like 1 km logic of tree belt. Vegetation ensures river nature i.e. perennial or seasonal ones across the world.


  2. I think Sadhguru is much more intelligent and a little less self centered or manipulative than what some may assume. Regardless, the act of coming together and planting trees builds a movement and community action. It is same like coming together to dance or sing or Gandhi’s walk etc. Now Any real biological damage from planting trees by the rivers is yet to be scientifically proven and maybe as per your theory, nature may accept it and work it in the ecosystem math and produce a better outcome. Who knows ?!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: